Testing of proton exchange composite membranes “polymer film-sulfounded polystyrene” in a direct methanol fuel cell at 60°C. Methanol crossover

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

The coefficients of diffusion permeability of methanol through the synthesized composite membranes “polymer film-sulfonated polystyrene” and Nafion-115 membrane were measured. For several composite membranes with significantly different transport properties the diffusion flux of methanol (qdiff) through these membranes was calculated under the conditions of a direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) at 60°C and 1–2 M concentration of the feed solution. Direct measurements of the crossover current and methanol crossover (qCVA) in DMFC based on these membranes were carried out by using the cyclic voltammetry method (CVA). It has been established that the qCVA values are on average 15% lower than the corresponding qdiff values calculated for each membrane based on its individual parameters (area, thickness, methanol permeability coefficient). The observed ratio qCVA<qdiff is proposed to be explained by the experimentally uncontrolled and, probably, incomplete oxidation of methanol at the cathode. Based on the obtained data, it can be concluded that without monitoring the degree of methanol oxidation at the DMFC cathode, the experimental values of the crossover qCVA can markedly differ from the calculated qdiff and the real values of the methanol crossover in the DMFC. A comparative study of performance of DMFCs based on synthesized composite membranes with significantly different transport properties and Nafion-115 membranes was carried out.It has been established that at 60°C and 1 M concentration of the feed solution, the methanol crossover value has practically no effect on the performance of the cells.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

D. Kritskaya

Branch of Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics Russian Academy of Sciences

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: dianakrit@gmail.com
Rússia, Chernogolovka, Moscow region, 142432

K. Novikova

Federal Research Center of Problems of Chemical Physics and Medicinal Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: dianakrit@gmail.com
Rússia, Chernogolovka, Moscow region, 142432

E. Sanginov

Federal Research Center of Problems of Chemical Physics and Medicinal Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: dianakrit@gmail.com
Rússia, Chernogolovka, Moscow region, 142432

A. Ponomarev

Branch of Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: dianakrit@gmail.com
Rússia, Chernogolovka, Moscow region, 142432

Bibliografia

  1. Kraytsberg A., Ein-EliY. // Energ. Fuel. 2014. V. 28. P. 7303.Wang Y., Diaz D.F.R., Chen K.S., Wang Z., Adroher X.C. // Materials Today. 2020. V. 32. P. 178.
  2. Филиппов С.П., Ярославцев А.Б. // Успехи химии. 2021. Т. 90. № 6. C. 627 (англоязычнаяверсия: Filippov S.P., Yaroslavtsev A.B. // Russ. Chem. Rev. 2021. V. 90. № 6. P. 627).
  3. Carrette L., Friedrich K.A., Stimming U. // Fuel Cells. 2001. V. 1. № 1. P. 5.
  4. Aricò A.S., Srinivasan S., Antonucci V. // Fuel Cells. 2001. V. 1, № 2. P. 133.
  5. Alias M.S., Kamarudin S.K., Zainoodin A.M., Masdar M.S. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2020. V. 45. № 38. P. 19620.
  6. Zhou J., Cao J., Zhang Y., Liu J., Chen J., Li M., Wang W., Liu X. // Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2021. V. 138. AN. 110660.
  7. Mauritz K.A., Moore R.B. // Chem. Rev. 2004. V. 104. P. 4535.
  8. Kusoglu A., Weber A.Z. // Chem. Rev. 2017. V. 117. P. 987.
  9. Deluca N.W., Elabd Y.A. // J. Polym. Sci. Pol. Phys. 2006. V. 44. P. 2201. Shin D.W., Guiver M.D., Lee Y.M. // Chem. Rev. 2017. V. 117. P. 4759.
  10. Byun G.H., Kim J.A., Kim N.Y., Cho Y.S., Park C.R. // Materials Today Energy. 2020. V. 17. AN. 100483.
  11. Nasef M.M., Gürsel S.A., Karabell, D., Güven O. // Progress in Polymer Sci. 2016. V. 63. P. 1.
  12. Nasef M.M. // J. Appl. Membr. Sci. Techn. 2022. V. 26. № 1. P. 51.
  13. Nasef M.M., Zubir N.A., Ismail A.F., Khayet M., Dahlan K.Z.M., Saidi H., Rohani R., Ngah T.I.S., Sulaiman N.A. // J. Membrane Sci. 2006. V. 268. P. 96.
  14. Gürsel S.A., Gubler L., Gupta B., Scherer G.G. // Adv. Polym. Sci. 2008. V. 215. P. 157.
  15. Yamaki T., Sawada S., Asano M., Maekawa Y., Yoshida M., Gubler L., Alkan-Gürsel S., Scherer G.G. // ECS Transactions. 2009. V. 25. P. 1439.
  16. Голубенко Д.В., Юрова П.А., Десятов А.В., Стенина И.А., Косарев С.А., Ярославцев А.Б. // Мембраны и мембранные технологи. 2022. Т. 12. № 6. С. 452 (англоязычная версия: Golubenko D.V., Yurova P.A., Desyatov A.V., Stenina I.A., Kosarev S.A., YaroslavtsevA.B. // Membr. Membr. Technol. 2022. V. 4. № 6. P. 398).
  17. Пономарев А.Н., Абдрашитов Э.Ф., Крицкая Д.А., Бокун В.Ч., Сангинов Е.А., Добровольский Ю.А. // Электрохимия. 2017. Т. 53. № 6. С. 666. (англоязычнаяверсия: PonomarevA.N., AbdrashitovE .F., Kritskaya D.A., Bokun V.C., Sanginov E.A., Dobrovol’skii Y.A. // Russ. J. Electrochem. 2017. V. 53. № 6. P. 589)
  18. Abdrashitov E.F., Bokun V.C., Kritskaya D.A., Sanginov E.A., Ponomarev A.N., Dobrovolsky Y.A. //Solid State Ionics. 2013. V. 251. P. 9.
  19. Abdrashitov E.F., Kritskaya D.A., Bokun V.C., Ponomarev A.N., Novikova K.S., Sanginov E.A., Dobrovolsky Y.A. // Solid State Ionics. 2016. V. 286. P. 135.
  20. Ren X., Springer T.E., Zawodzinski T.A., Gottesfeld S. // J.Electrochem. Soc. 2000. V. 147. P. 466.
  21. Almheiri S., Liu H. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2015. V. 40. P. 10969.
  22. Génevé T., Turpin C., Régnier J., Rallières O., Verdu O., Rakotondrainibe A., Lombard K. // Fuel Cells. 2017. V. 17. № 2. P. 210.
  23. Braz B.A., Oliveira V.B., Pinto A.M.F.R. // Energy. 2020. V. 208. P. 112394.
  24. Ponomarev A.N., Kritskaya D.A., Abdrashitov E.F., Bokun V.C., Sanginov E.A., Novikova K.S., Dremova N.N., Dobrovolsky Y.A. // J. Appl. Pol. Sci. 2020. V. 137. P. 49563.
  25. Новикова К.С., Абдрашитов Э.Ф., Крицкая Д.А., Пономарев А.Н., Сангинов Е.А., Добровольский Ю.А. // Электрохимия. 2021. Т. 57. № 11. С. 645. (англоязычная версия: Novikova K.S., Abdrashitov E.F., Kritskaya D.A., Ponomarev A.N., Sanginov E.A., Dobrovol’skii Yu.A.// Russ. J.Electrochem.2021. V. 57. № 11. P. 1047)
  26. Wells C.F. // Thermochim. Acta. 1992. V. 200. P. 443.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar
2. Fig. 1. Cyclic voltammogram of the MFC based on the UHMWPE-sPS composite membrane at 60°C. The concentration of the feed methanol solution is 1M.

Baixar (3KB)
Metadados
3. Fig. 2. Effect of the methanol solution feed rate in the anode part of the MFC on the current JCVA m at 60°C. 1 – Nafion-115, 1 M; 2 – UHMWPE-sPS, 1 M; 3 – por-PTFE-sPS, 1 M; 4 – Nafion-115, 2 M; 5 – UHMWPE-sPS, 2 M.

Baixar (2KB)
Metadados
4. Fig. 3. Dependence of the crossover current JCVA-m on the MeOH concentration in the anode part of the MFC at 60°C and solution pumping rates of 5 and 9 ml/min. 1 – Nafion-115; 2 – UHMWPE-sPS; 3 – por-PTFE-sPS.

Baixar (3KB)
Metadados
5. Fig. 4. Comparison of the methanol crossover values qCVA, measured by the CVA method, with the calculated values qdiff at 60°C. The flow rate of the methanol solution is 5 ml/min; the concentration of the methanol solution is 1 and 2 M. 1 – Nafion-115; 2 – UHMWPE-sPS; 3 – por-PTFE-sPS.

Baixar (2KB)
Metadados
6. Fig. 5. Volt-ampere and power characteristics of MFCs based on synthesized composite membranes and Nafion-115 membrane at 60°C and a methanol feed solution concentration of 1 M. 1 – Nafion-115; 2 – UHMWPE-sPS; 3 – por-PTFE-sPS.

Baixar (4KB)
Metadados

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024